Materials thickness

This area is to be used for submitting plans, referencing and conversations related to building stills and accessories.

Materials thickness

Postby RC Al » Wed Jul 25, 2018 7:31 pm

I'm trying to get a handle on whats better, where, as to thickness of materials for a: stills and b: boilers

I realise that insulation makes a big difference to what i'm putting forward here
I also realise that construction methods have a bearing on material selection too

Still - I have it in my mind that thinner materials would be better for columns to get up to equib faster and produce a fraction more reflux - the thinner material is easier to heat and there isnt as much mass there to keep the heat, so an uninsulated column would have a greater "cycling" through the walls ie reflux.
Whereas a heavier wall would hold the temp more - this would make the column more "stable" ??
Pipe wall thickness can have a bit of a bearing on making bubble caps too (at least on paper) - I have worked out a smidgen more flow area (vs standard pipe thicknesses) on to a plate by using constructed thin wall caps and risers - 0.5mm region - how thin can a cap get?

Boiler - All i can find on boilers is that if its externally heated, a thick base is good, so for an elec heated boiler it dosent matter how thin you make it? (within engineering/stregnth constraints) provided of course that its insulated? I looked at an US eng standard calculator (zero pressure) for wall thickness for a 2-300l pot - 0.2mm plus corrosion allowance - errr.... ummm.... dosent sound like enough, but then i think of what a 200l drum is made of and well... ok - depends if its going to used as a football i suppose.

Is there any advantage to going thicker than say 0.5mm on a SS boiler? What about on a jacketed one?
RC Al
Mentor
 
Posts: 1568
Joined: Mon Oct 23, 2017 4:58 pm
Location: Sunshine Coast Area
equipment: 3 plate 4" glasser
2" Potty

Re: Materials thickness

Postby bluc » Wed Jul 25, 2018 7:38 pm

I would think a thicker colum means more stable temp less fluctuations from wind etc although this can also be achieved with thinner column and insulation...boiler strength strong enough to hold weight of column. Heavy duty colum needs heavy duty boiler...
bluc
Site Donor
 
Posts: 8967
Joined: Tue Apr 14, 2015 5:47 pm
Location: sunshine coast
equipment: 2" pot with 2" shotty 400mm long 5x 1/2" on a t500 boiler.
50l keg boiler 4" still mount 4" sight glass 1" drain..
4 plate 4" bubbler, 600mm packed section

Re: Materials thickness

Postby woodduck » Wed Jul 25, 2018 8:15 pm

Your over complicating things here mate, I love your enthusiasm but your splitting hairs :laughing-rolling: All these bubblers on here work even though they differ in many ways. Whatever you decide will work as long as it follows the main principles.

On the thin wall column, I agree with bluc. If your getting passive reflux all the way up the colomn you will have problems with the fractions not separating properly because they aren't reaching the top.
woodduck
Lifetime Member
 
Posts: 3497
Joined: Mon Jun 16, 2014 5:54 pm
Location: Good old country SA
equipment: 4 plate 6" copper bubbler, 6 plate 4" glass bubbler with 500mm packed section three way thumper sitting on a 50 ltr keg boiler with 6000watts, 2" pot still and a 2" boka.

Re: Materials thickness

Postby hillzabilly » Wed Jul 25, 2018 8:35 pm

Thinner material is a lot harder ta TIG weld ,very well and it may have to hold up plated colomn of over 20kg and use over the years,adding up how many tri clamps and legs need fitting,a lot of pipe and fittings are standard thickness too,I thought about building a perfect boiler but after trying beer kegs(about 1.6-1.8mm and thicker) never considered it again over 10years ago .cheers hilzabilly ;-)
hillzabilly
 
Posts: 1509
Images: 0
Joined: Sun Jun 10, 2012 3:18 pm
Location: PERTH WEST AUSSIE
equipment: 10 gallon OZARK pot still ,2inch and 3inch Nixon Stone coloum stills ,10 and 18 gal beer keg boilers,5gal thumper keg.And the one and only 4" Five Star Southern Cross .

Re: Materials thickness

Postby warramungas » Thu Jul 26, 2018 9:48 am

If you're talking thermodynamics of metals you're overthinking it way too much.
Thickness is important in still design mainly for structural strength and ease of building purposes.
Once your still is up to temp it will maintain things quite well. If you want to use the walls as a heat sink (buffer against the cold) you'll need unrealistically thick walls (which probably wouldn't work very well anyway) whereas a small amount of insulation will accomplish the same task easily.

Oh. And engineers always aim for minimum as more than the required minimum costs more money and clients don't like that. Believe me I've worked with enough under engineered cock ups over the years. And some of their designs were pretty ordinary too. A 0.2mm pot isn't designed to hold a 20+ kg still on the top of of it. Us hobby guys we want to over engineer a bit if we can.
Last edited by warramungas on Thu Jul 26, 2018 9:57 am, edited 2 times in total.
warramungas
 
Posts: 1436
Joined: Sun Oct 18, 2015 9:38 pm
Location: Nor Perth
equipment: 180 litre fermenter x 2
30 liter boiler
PDA-1
2" four plate modular bubbler
2" one meter long LM column
110 liter boiler with 25 liter (max) inline thumper
4" x 4 plate bubble cap still

Re: Materials thickness

Postby db1979 » Fri Jul 27, 2018 7:12 am

I agree with everything that has been said above.

If you are looking at saving metal for reduced heat up time then have shorter modules. Don't go shorter than 100 mm between plates on a 4" bubbler, there's a rule that says you need to have them spaced as far apart as the plates are wide. On larger stills I think this becomes irrelevant as industrial stills using valve/caps/sieves, the plates seem to be much closer than the width of the plate. It won't make a huge difference though as the column heats up pretty fast anyway. 1 gram of copper requires 0.386 joules of energy to raise it's temperature by 1 degree Celsius.

The biggest energy sink in the heat up process is water in the boiler. It requires 4.18 joules of energy for every gram to be raised by 1 degree Celsius. Ethanol requires 2.46 joules per gram to be raised 1 degree Celsius. So you'll find that heatup times on a 40 % low wines boiler charge will be shorter than on a 10 % wash.

In addition to the insulation mentioned above, if in winter and you are already heating your ferments, you can also save time by keeping your finished washes warm right up until filling the boiler. I think hillz also runs a worm through his finishes washes to heat them up when running consecutive stripping runs, further reducing heatup time.
db1979
 
Posts: 1760
Joined: Sat Dec 29, 2012 3:47 pm
Location: South of the big smoke in banana bender land.
equipment: Eve - 4" x 4 plate solid state bubbler (sieve plates), 330 mm packed section on a keg boiler with 2 x 2000 W elements.
Currently having a makeover: 2" x 4 plate solid state bubbler (1" bubble caps, no sight glasses...maybe not for much longer!) on a bain-marie boiler.

Re: Materials thickness

Postby RC Al » Sat Jul 28, 2018 9:02 pm

Thanks for the replies everyone

So if you haven't noticed, I can get a bit OC , I'm happy to split a hundred hairs before I cut anything :roll:
Sorry, please bear with me :D

I asked because sometimes I actually have a choice when scrounging the scrappy's, and in what I have grabbed so far I have two thicknesses in a couple of sizes of copper, so I can assign different bits for different stuff, I will use thinner sizes where it won't matter or where it would be beneficial, perhaps the product condenser or defleg?
RC Al
Mentor
 
Posts: 1568
Joined: Mon Oct 23, 2017 4:58 pm
Location: Sunshine Coast Area
equipment: 3 plate 4" glasser
2" Potty

Re: Materials thickness

Postby Mr Tinker » Sun Jul 29, 2018 11:29 am

I agree with Warra about over engineering a bit on anything that needs a bit of structural strength or has some sort of safety factor about it (boilers, columns, legs etc), but when it comes to bubble caps and risers, material thickness can have a significant affect size wise, on the free area for flow.
Now whether this affects to performance of your still to any great length... who knows? I’m fairly certain there are more than a few bubblers out there that work just fine and were just made from whatever was available, with little to no consideration of such things.

I tried very hard to make sure that the area of the riser, holes in the riser, area between riser and cap and finally slot size were all well balanced on my bubbler. My bubble plates work very well, but I have no ‘unbalanced’ caps to compare it to so again... who knows?

No real answers for you, maybe just some food for thought.

Cheers
Mr Tinker
 
Posts: 60
Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2017 1:41 pm
Location: West of Brisbane
equipment: 4" Copper Modular Bubbler, 4 Multicap Plates
110l Copper Boiler on Gas
180l Stainless Fermenter

Re: Materials thickness

Postby scythe » Tue Jul 31, 2018 7:18 pm

On a hobby scale nothing really matters all that much.
I tend to split hairs a few times when overthinking things.

Thicker boiler material will be able to take more weight.
Thicker column material will be stronger and be less effected by errant breezes but if you add insulation to both of the above thermal properties of the boiler/column become a moot point.

Worst cast senario is that you need to run a few ml/min slower...
Which might mean an extra 10mins run time, maybe.

Were this an industrial column taking MWatts of power to run then yes absolute performance is a must.
scythe
 
Posts: 1860
Joined: Thu Nov 14, 2013 6:34 am
Location: Central West NSW
equipment: Dreaming of a 4" bubbler


Return to Hardware Research & Development



Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 14 guests

x