Yummyrum wrote:Stoney, your a man after my own heart :laughing-rolling: .......I'm sure its a condition that plagues most electronic guys ...you just want to automate everything .Funnily though , after years of distilling and countless hours of coming up with elaborate schemes ,I have built nothing .I just love twiddling taps :handgestures-thumbupleft:....and dream about them twiddling themselves :laughing-rolling:
BTW ..... I do think that what hillzabilly said would work.Its due to the fact that reflux ratio in a Liquid Management still is dependent on Boiler power .
The take off rate is set by the needle valve so if you increase boiler power you create more vapour and therefore more reflux . More reflux = higher ABV and the temp will drop to AZEO temp .
Decrease boiler power and you decrease vapour and therefore there is less reflux . Less reflux = lower ABV and the temp will rise .
So my logic would be that if you monitor vapour temp ,then the PID should control the boiler power and slowly increase it throughout the run.
I think this is possibly a bit about distilling you may have not been aware of by not having a fixed power boiler .By having to constantly fiddle with your temp you have not seen the slow rise in temp that happens in a Packed column reflux still as the run progresses .The rise is most apparent at the end when tails comes on .This is where your PID would see the slight rise in temp and start to increase boiler power to increase reflux and maintain the purity while compressing the tails .
And obviously a condition of flooding should never be allowed to happen
I did my last run fast, quick and dirty, ran most of it with the element on 100% and slight gas assistance as well. Learnt a lot and this post is spot on. It dropped ABV by a point or two and column top was about 0.1 or 0.2 higher than usual.
good stuff.